[Sun Sep  2 18:27:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (273.8, 149.5) = 16 54 23.85 -42 1 46.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 62.3 +/- 12.0
  Background counts = 26.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Sep  2 18:27:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.95'
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.90"
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.955
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 11.90"
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 330.145000, observed total counts = 255.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 45
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.90"
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.955
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 1, mean size = 11.90"
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Warning, spatial fit 40 centroid is now closest to src. 54
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0