[Sun Sep  2 18:27:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.3, 468.3) = 16 54 24.74 -41 38 39.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 60.8 +/- 12.4
  Background counts = 33.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Sep  2 18:27:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.47'
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.053
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 12.66"
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:21 2012] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.053
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 1, mean size = 12.66"
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source 39 is offset by 1.527292 and -2.491341 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.725002 x 0.725002, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9