[Sun Sep 2 18:27:28 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (238.1, 494.5) = 16 54 37.63 -41 36 43.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 62.7 +/- 12.2 Background counts = 26.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sun Sep 2 18:27:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.88' [Sun Sep 2 18:31:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Sep 2 18:31:34 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sun Sep 2 18:31:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87" [Sun Sep 2 18:31:34 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.029 [Sun Sep 2 18:31:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 13.87" [Sun Sep 2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv [Sun Sep 2 21:54:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 21:54:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv [Sun Sep 2 21:54:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Sep 2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv [Sun Sep 2 21:54:28 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 21:54:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv [Sun Sep 2 21:54:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 03:49:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 466.637000, observed total counts = 371.000000 [Mon Sep 3 03:49:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 33 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 3 03:49:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Sep 3 03:49:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Sep 3 03:49:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Sep 3 03:49:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Sep 3 03:49:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Sep 3 03:50:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 3 03:50:14 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Mon Sep 3 03:50:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87" [Mon Sep 3 03:50:14 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.029 [Mon Sep 3 03:50:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 13.87" [Mon Sep 3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:42:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:42:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:42:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:42:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 467.611000, observed total counts = 371.000000 [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 33 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Sep 3 11:19:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0