[Sun Sep  2 18:27:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (258.2, 328.9) = 16 54 29.85 -41 48 45.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 172.0 +/- 20.0
  Background counts = 73.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0009

[Sun Sep  2 18:27:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.66'
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.087
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 100 for pass 0, mean size = 8.26"
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 984.778000, observed total counts = 937.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 106 = 0.553368 pixels
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 100 to 97
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] 934.389800 total counts/ 875.129000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.003233
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 106 = 0.553368 pixels
  Position = (258.1, 329.4) = 16 54 29.91 -41 48 44.9
  Extent = 3.5 (2.5-4.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 59.3 +/- 30.6
  Background counts = 875.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 3.52"
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.876
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 1, mean size = 3.52"
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 984.530000, observed total counts = 937.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 106 = 0.004598 pixels
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 91 to 88
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] 934.952000 total counts/ 876.750000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.965622
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 106 = 0.004598 pixels
  Position = (258.1, 329.4) = 16 54 29.91 -41 48 44.9
  Extent = 3.5 (2.5-4.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 58.2 +/- 30.6
  Background counts = 876.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9