[Sun Sep  2 18:28:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (226.0, 312.1) = 16 54 42.41 -41 49 59.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 69.2 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 16.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Sep  2 18:28:15 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.35'
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.10"
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.339
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 0, mean size = 9.10"
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Mon Sep  3 01:04:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 251.149000, observed total counts = 211.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 32
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:36 2012] Source is confused with source 88
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.10"
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.339
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 1, mean size = 9.10"
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Mon Sep  3 08:54:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 231.406000, observed total counts = 211.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 32 = 0.215898 pixels
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] 240.231300 total counts/ 208.683000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.183898
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 32 = 0.215898 pixels
  Position = (226.2, 312.0) = 16 54 42.34 -41 50 0.4
  Extent = 5.3" x 4.2", rotation angle = 86
  Source counts = 31.5 +/- 15.5
  Background counts = 208.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.26
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9