[Sun Jul 29 09:37:23 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (239.9, 285.8) = 18 47 41.84 55 37 42.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 65.0 +/- 11.1 Background counts = 18.1 Rate = 0.09 +/- 0.02 [Sun Jul 29 09:37:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.34' [Sun Jul 29 09:39:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 29 09:39:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.60" [Sun Jul 29 09:39:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.856 [Sun Jul 29 09:39:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 0, mean size = 8.60" [Sun Jul 29 17:54:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 17:54:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv [Sun Jul 29 17:54:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 17:54:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv [Sun Jul 29 17:54:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jul 29 17:54:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 17:54:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.csv [Sun Jul 29 17:54:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 17:54:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.csv [Sun Jul 29 17:54:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 86 centroid is now closest to src. 82 [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jul 29 17:58:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jul 29 17:58:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 29 17:58:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.60" [Sun Jul 29 17:58:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.856 [Sun Jul 29 17:58:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 8.60" [Mon Jul 30 01:22:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists [Mon Jul 30 01:22:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Mon Jul 30 01:22:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 30 01:22:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Mon Jul 30 01:22:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 30 01:22:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists [Mon Jul 30 01:22:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Mon Jul 30 01:22:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 30 01:22:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Mon Jul 30 01:22:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109463701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 30 01:26:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 532.487000, observed total counts = 489.000000 [Mon Jul 30 01:26:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 86 = 2.609609 pixels [Mon Jul 30 01:26:26 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 69 to 66 [Mon Jul 30 01:26:26 2012] 527.982900 total counts/ 517.758000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.449361 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 86 = 2.609609 pixels Position = (239.4, 288.4) = 18 47 42.13 55 37 59.2 Extent = 10.6 (2.1-31.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 10.2 +/- 23.0 Background counts = 517.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.03 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability