[Tue Jul 3 03:05:44 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (268.1, 240.0) = 10 7 42.86 -20 20 5.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 49.1 +/- 9.8 Background counts = 16.5 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003 [Tue Jul 3 03:05:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.77' [Tue Jul 3 03:06:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 3 03:06:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.82" [Tue Jul 3 03:06:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.979 [Tue Jul 3 03:06:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.82" [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Jul 3 03:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109461301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 10.662267 pixels away [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 3 03:29:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0