[Tue Aug  7 20:23:25 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (415.5, 425.9) = 4 54 28.80 -66 15 9.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 56.5 +/- 9.6
  Background counts = 6.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Aug  7 20:23:25 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.55'
[Tue Aug  7 21:22:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug  7 21:22:25 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Aug  7 21:22:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.70"
[Tue Aug  7 21:22:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 48, frac = 1.026
[Tue Aug  7 21:22:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.70"
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:51 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 21:51:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 135.734000, observed total counts = 131.000000
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 1.313596 pixels
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] 133.139000 total counts/ 113.780000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.814889
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 1.313596 pixels
  Position = (414.5, 426.6) = 4 54 29.59 -66 15 7.2
  Extent = 5.6" x 5.6", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 19.4 +/- 11.5
  Background counts = 113.8
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug  7 22:17:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug  7 23:09:24 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug  7 23:09:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.56"
[Tue Aug  7 23:09:24 2012] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.712
[Tue Aug  7 23:09:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 5.56"
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Aug  7 23:45:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109260201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 130.744000, observed total counts = 117.000000
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug  8 00:06:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9