[Fri Dec 16 19:43:35 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (324.4, 297.0) = 23 4 42.35 -8 41 59.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 166.0 +/- 20.0 Background counts = 5.2 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Fri Dec 16 19:43:35 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.89' [Fri Dec 16 19:58:22 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Dec 16 19:58:22 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.37" [Fri Dec 16 19:58:22 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.675 [Fri Dec 16 19:58:22 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.37" [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:24:48 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Source 1 is offset by 3.150526 and -7.811089 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.709425 x 2.709425, not incorporating fit results [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Dec 16 20:24:51 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Dec 16 20:32:51 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Dec 16 20:32:51 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.37" [Fri Dec 16 20:32:51 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.675 [Fri Dec 16 20:32:51 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.37" [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 20:46:02 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109130701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Source 1 is offset by 3.157997 and -7.811089 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.931462 x 2.167926, not incorporating fit results [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Dec 16 20:46:04 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0