[Wed Sep  5 06:45:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (186.6, 311.8) = 1 24 26.69 -35 2 2.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 47.3 +/- 8.7
  Background counts = 6.1
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Wed Sep  5 06:45:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.16'
[Wed Sep  5 07:02:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 07:02:34 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Wed Sep  5 07:02:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.51"
[Wed Sep  5 07:02:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.706
[Wed Sep  5 07:02:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 10.51"
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:10:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 10.402369 pixels away
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 07:17:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 07:30:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 07:30:24 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Wed Sep  5 07:30:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.51"
[Wed Sep  5 07:30:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.706
[Wed Sep  5 07:30:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 10.51"
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Wed Sep  5 07:32:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109130201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 13.909010 pixels away
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 07:33:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8