[Sat Jun  1 16:44:46 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (279.3, 236.1) = 13 27 10.29 -62 7 59.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 48.1 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 6.3
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun  1 16:44:50 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.73'
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:48 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:48 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:48 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.983
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:48 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.79"
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:52 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:52 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:45:52 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  1 16:46:54 2013] Source is confused with source 21
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.983
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 8.79"
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:21 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:22 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:22 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:22 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109100201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 46 at 10.358755 pixels away
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  1 16:47:55 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9