[Wed Sep  5 13:07:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (251.7, 363.3) = 12 4 57.71 27 57 11.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 60.2 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 27.5
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Wed Sep  5 13:07:15 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.79'
[Wed Sep  5 13:08:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 13:08:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.33"
[Wed Sep  5 13:08:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.894
[Wed Sep  5 13:08:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 9.33"
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Sep  5 13:49:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 274.774000, observed total counts = 227.000000
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.33"
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.894
[Wed Sep  5 14:34:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 9.33"
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Wed Sep  5 15:02:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109080101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 274.553000, observed total counts = 227.000000
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 15:49:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0