[Mon Aug 27 07:22:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (473.8, 418.2) = 22 47 30.76 -51 1 44.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 52.0 +/- 8.9
  Background counts = 3.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Aug 27 07:22:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.40'
[Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.13"
[Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 62, frac = 1.103
[Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 14.13"
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 96.062100, observed total counts = 81.000000
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 27 08:42:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.13"
[Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 62, frac = 1.103
[Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 14.13"
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 95.221800, observed total counts = 81.000000
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 27 09:16:27 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9