[Mon Aug 27 07:22:03 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (307.5, 301.9) = 22 48 47.45 -51 10 15.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 59.2 +/- 11.5 Background counts = 5.4 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001 [Mon Aug 27 07:22:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.70' [Mon Aug 27 07:59:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 27 07:59:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.78" [Mon Aug 27 07:59:22 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.885 [Mon Aug 27 07:59:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 6.78" [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 08:20:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 5 [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Aug 27 08:42:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 27 08:56:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 27 08:56:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.78" [Mon Aug 27 08:56:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.885 [Mon Aug 27 08:56:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 6.78" [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv [Mon Aug 27 09:06:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109070601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 14.213854 pixels away [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 27 09:16:26 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9