[Thu Aug  9 10:10:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (294.5, 290.8) = 22 48 32.92 -51 9 38.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 407.1 +/- 57.5
  Background counts = 1573.0
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.01

[Thu Aug  9 10:10:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.63'
[Thu Aug  9 10:14:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 10:14:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.74"
[Thu Aug  9 10:14:54 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.190
[Thu Aug  9 10:14:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 6.74"
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:46:49 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14305.100000, observed total counts = 12819.000000
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 10
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 9
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:34 2012] Source is confused with source 9
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.74"
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:43 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.190
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 6.74"
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:58:38 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0109070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 13:01:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14301.500000, observed total counts = 12819.000000
[Thu Aug  9 13:01:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 10
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug  9 13:01:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14955.700000, observed total counts = 14901.000000
[Thu Aug  9 13:01:18 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.152615 pixels
[Thu Aug  9 13:01:18 2012] 14780.405900 total counts/ 14684.200000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.793920
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.152615 pixels
  Position = (294.4, 290.6) = 22 48 32.97 -51 9 38.0
  Extent = 4.1 (1.7-6.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 96.2 +/- 121.6
  Background counts = 14684.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.02
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability