[Sun Jul 15 09:04:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (254.7, 387.9) = 16 14 16.65 -22 55 8.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 49.5 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 22.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Jul 15 09:04:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.22'
[Sun Jul 15 11:58:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 11:58:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.04"
[Sun Jul 15 11:58:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.698
[Sun Jul 15 11:58:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 0, mean size = 10.04"
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Source 24 is offset by -2.497644 and 3.271874 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.852239 x 0.852239, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 29 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 12:58:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 15:47:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 15:47:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.04"
[Sun Jul 15 15:47:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.698
[Sun Jul 15 15:47:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 10.04"
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:44:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 249.997000, observed total counts = 240.000000
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 0.818386 pixels
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] 247.237300 total counts/ 220.039000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.833547
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 0.818386 pixels
  Position = (254.0, 387.5) = 16 14 16.87 -22 55 7.6
  Extent = 3.0" x 3.0", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 27.2 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 220.0
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0003
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 16:45:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9