[Tue May 14 01:00:35 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (119.1, 274.1) = 16 26 16.91 -24 20 11.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 48.4 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 10.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May 14 01:00:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.12'
[Tue May 14 01:01:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 01:01:09 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 14 01:01:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.99"
[Tue May 14 01:01:09 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.658
[Tue May 14 01:01:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 12.99"
[Tue May 14 01:01:10 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue May 14 01:01:10 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue May 14 01:01:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 01:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue May 14 01:01:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue May 14 01:01:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 14 01:01:38 2013] Source is confused with source 14
[Tue May 14 01:01:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 01:01:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.99"
[Tue May 14 01:01:59 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.658
[Tue May 14 01:01:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 12.99"
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue May 14 01:02:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0109060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 14 01:02:25 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9