[Mon Jun 11 11:49:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (279.6, 250.8) = 12 23 11.27 10 35 22.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 42.8 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 19.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Mon Jun 11 11:49:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.72'
[Mon Jun 11 13:51:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 11 13:51:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.29"
[Mon Jun 11 13:51:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.081
[Mon Jun 11 13:51:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.29"
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Source 27 is offset by -0.522008 and 4.581767 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.952768 x 0.952768, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 11 14:32:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 11 16:01:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 11 16:01:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.29"
[Mon Jun 11 16:01:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.081
[Mon Jun 11 16:01:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 8.29"
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 404.949000, observed total counts = 406.000000
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:24 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 0.313668 pixels
[Mon Jun 11 16:45:24 2012] 419.315000 total counts/ 406.719000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.624576
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 0.313668 pixels
  Position = (279.7, 250.5) = 12 23 11.26 10 35 22.5
  Extent = 2.1" x 2.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.6 +/- 20.5
  Background counts = 406.7
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability