[Tue Jun  5 10:58:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (270.4, 281.8) = 23 54 11.70 -10 24 20.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 326.2 +/- 27.8
  Background counts = 240.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jun  5 10:58:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.36'
[Tue Jun  5 11:04:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 11:04:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.61"
[Tue Jun  5 11:04:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.840
[Tue Jun  5 11:04:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.61"
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 13:57:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Source 9 is offset by 1.042732 and 5.652584 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.723577 x 3.723577, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Source 9 is offset by 0.077893 and 1.800928 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.894308 x 0.894308, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 17:13:53 2012] Source is confused with source 20
[Tue Jun  5 17:14:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 17:14:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.61"
[Tue Jun  5 17:14:24 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.840
[Tue Jun  5 17:14:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.61"
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jun  5 19:25:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0108460301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 22:06:05 2012] Source 9 is offset by 1.250164 and 5.805296 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.295894 x 4.295894, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 22:06:05 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3011.910000, observed total counts = 2989.000000
[Tue Jun  5 22:06:05 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 6.486155 pixels
[Tue Jun  5 22:06:05 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 20
[Tue Jun  5 22:06:05 2012] 3480.942668 total counts/ 3480.940000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000045
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 6.486155 pixels
  Position = (268.1, 287.9) = 23 54 12.38 -10 23 46.9
  Extent = 15.0" x 15.0", rotation angle = -0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 59.0
  Background counts = 3480.9
  Rate = 2e-07 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability