[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.4, 271.5) = 23 25 25.86 -12 10 8.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 39.3 +/- 10.9
  Background counts = 24.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.97'
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41"
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.287
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.41"
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 689.097000, observed total counts = 615.000000
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source 20 is offset by 8.944251 and -1.979607 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.809333 x 4.809333, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41"
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.287
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 7.41"
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 691.652000, observed total counts = 615.000000
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source 20 is offset by 8.919654 and -1.979607 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.674207 x 4.674207, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8