[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (313.2, 273.2) = 23 25 22.37 -12 9 55.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 53.3 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 30.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.12'
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.709
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 7.49"
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source 19 is offset by -1.115413 and 2.324017 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.860566 x 0.860566, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.709
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 7.49"
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source 19 is offset by -1.123362 and 2.312983 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.860566 x 0.860566, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9