[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (307.4, 275.1) = 23 25 24.07 -12 9 50.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.7 +/- 12.1
  Background counts = 28.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0009

[Thu Jun  7 08:51:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.81'
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.33"
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.785
[Thu Jun  7 11:36:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 7.33"
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source is confused with source 19
[Thu Jun  7 12:42:57 2012] Source is confused with source 20
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.33"
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.785
[Thu Jun  7 15:32:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.33"
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Jun  7 16:33:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 16:34:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9