[Wed Aug 15 05:12:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (221.0, 103.0) = 13 42 13.35 26 8 27.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.7 +/- 12.1
  Background counts = 23.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Wed Aug 15 05:12:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.24'
[Wed Aug 15 10:18:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 10:18:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.05"
[Wed Aug 15 10:18:59 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.150
[Wed Aug 15 10:18:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 14.05"
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Wed Aug 15 13:10:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 185.032000, observed total counts = 162.000000
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 27
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 15 13:11:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 15 17:54:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 17:54:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.05"
[Wed Aug 15 17:54:46 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.150
[Wed Aug 15 17:54:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 14.05"
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108460101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Warning: source 43 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 27 at 18.994203 pixels away
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 15 20:19:28 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9