[Tue Jan 17 04:46:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (283.3, 486.5) = 3 32 40.02 -27 35 14.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.8 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 18.7
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001

[Tue Jan 17 04:47:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.68'
[Tue Jan 17 06:44:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan 17 06:44:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.27"
[Tue Jan 17 06:44:11 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.972
[Tue Jan 17 06:44:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 13.27"
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 07:45:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 13.816644 pixels away
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jan 17 07:46:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jan 17 09:48:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan 17 09:48:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.27"
[Tue Jan 17 09:48:16 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.972
[Tue Jan 17 09:48:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 13.27"
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:27 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:27 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 17 11:54:28 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0108062301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 17 11:55:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 289.000000, observed total counts = 289.000000
[Tue Jan 17 11:55:01 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.285332 pixels
[Tue Jan 17 11:55:01 2012] 286.290600 total counts/ 259.775000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.645140
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.285332 pixels
  Position = (283.0, 486.7) = 3 32 40.10 -27 35 16.4
  Extent = 5.4 (3.3-10.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 26.5 +/- 16.9
  Background counts = 259.8
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability