[Tue Mar 27 01:19:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (207.0, 327.9) = 18 57 3.77 -37 51 0.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.8 +/- 10.1
  Background counts = 27.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Mar 27 01:19:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.97'
[Tue Mar 27 02:58:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 02:58:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.91"
[Tue Mar 27 02:58:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.166
[Tue Mar 27 02:58:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 9.91"
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 04:08:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -129.318000, observed total counts = 234.000000
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 04:09:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 05:38:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 27 05:38:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.91"
[Tue Mar 27 05:38:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.166
[Tue Mar 27 05:38:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 9.91"
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0106260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 16.410478 pixels away
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 06:45:37 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9