[Fri Jun 29 10:51:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.4, 425.0) = 16 40 57.30 -53 37 23.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 244.3 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 53.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.20'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.03"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.787
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 11.03"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 10.327695 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 10.764994 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1004.430000, observed total counts = 1072.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.450778 pixels
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 5 to 21
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] 758.140700 total counts/ 687.561000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.691685
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 1.450778 pixels
  Position = (304.9, 425.1) = 16 40 58.01 -53 37 23.8
  Extent = 4.7 (3.6-6.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 70.6 +/- 27.5
  Background counts = 687.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:55 2012] Source is confused with source 17
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 4.75"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.185
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 4.75"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 973.386000, observed total counts = 1054.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 0.182934 pixels
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] 744.671500 total counts/ 665.619000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.064099
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 0.182934 pixels
  Position = (304.9, 424.9) = 16 40 58.00 -53 37 24.6
  Extent = 5.0 (3.8-6.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 79.1 +/- 27.3
  Background counts = 665.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00