[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (304.4, 504.0) = 16 40 58.27 -53 31 39.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.8 +/- 16.2
  Background counts = 24.9
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0008

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.91'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.88"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 50, frac = 0.917
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 13.88"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source 33 is offset by -1.946969 and 1.402587 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.794244 x 1.794244, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:55 2012] Source is confused with source 10
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.88"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 50, frac = 0.917
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 13.88"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00