[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.8, 236.2) = 16 40 39.87 -53 50 55.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 72.5 +/- 12.7
  Background counts = 90.7
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.50'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.917
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 9.18"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 15.022404 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.917
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 9.18"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1232.900000, observed total counts = 775.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00