[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (226.5, 320.4) = 16 41 36.45 -53 45 0.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 70.9 +/- 16.3
  Background counts = 84.2
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.45'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.15"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.921
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 0, mean size = 9.15"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 10.717486 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 26 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 12.034248 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.15"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.921
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 9.15"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source 23 is offset by 1.199281 and 7.777910 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.504326 x 1.504326, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00