[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (230.5, 340.9) = 16 41 34.48 -53 43 25.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.3 +/- 14.2
  Background counts = 80.3
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.81'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.33"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.893
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 9.33"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source 22 is offset by -4.550612 and 7.463227 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.135425 x 1.135425, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.33"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.893
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 9.33"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source 22 is offset by -6.397209 and -6.274014 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.218704 x 2.218704, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00