[Fri Jun 29 10:51:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (431.5, 228.0) = 16 39 55.73 -53 51 40.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 117.9 +/- 16.3
  Background counts = 36.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.92'
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.89"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.005
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.89"
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 15.823033 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.89"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.005
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.89"
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:22 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 15.645932 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00