[Fri Jun 29 10:51:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (305.1, 459.0) = 16 40 57.90 -53 34 55.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 119.8 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 37.0
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0008

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.65'
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.25"
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.818
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 12.25"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:33 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 10.418789 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source 7 is offset by 0.259020 and -4.432712 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 11.266437 x 3.845981, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.25"
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.818
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 12.25"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 18
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00