[Fri Jun 29 10:51:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.2, 395.0) = 16 40 56.38 -53 39 36.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 265.7 +/- 22.8
  Background counts = 83.3
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.03'
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.95"
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.966
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 9.95"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 17120.000000, observed total counts = 1229.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.95"
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.966
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 9.95"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 26
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Source 4 is offset by -0.295206 and -5.851200 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.275908 x 5.275908, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00