[Fri Jun 29 10:51:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (229.5, 303.8) = 16 41 35.01 -53 46 9.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 96.4 +/- 16.4
  Background counts = 77.3
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.02'
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.94"
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 8.94"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source 28 is offset by 8.678704 and -0.002509 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.098313 x 1.098313, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source 28 is offset by 0.171015 and 2.115445 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.160189 x 1.160189, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.94"
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.958
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 8.94"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 28 at 11.454916 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00