[Fri Jun 29 10:51:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (390.2, 315.0) = 16 40 16.13 -53 45 23.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 94.0 +/- 14.2 Background counts = 87.7 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Fri Jun 29 10:51:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.76' [Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.81" [Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.560 [Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 9.81" [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 840.102000, observed total counts = 607.000000 [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 27 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.81" [Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.560 [Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 9.81" [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 760.409000, observed total counts = 607.000000 [Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 27 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00