[Fri Jun 29 10:51:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (322.8, 396.6) = 16 40 49.23 -53 39 35.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 80.1 +/- 14.7
  Background counts = 78.7
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 29 10:51:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.33'
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.09"
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.817
[Fri Jun 29 13:54:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 10.09"
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 16:03:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source 26 is offset by 0.533380 and 1.887295 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.160189 x 1.160189, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 17:28:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.09"
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.817
[Fri Jun 29 18:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 10.09"
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jun 29 20:19:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105470401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 10.298871 pixels away
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 29 21:25:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00