[Sat Aug 11 10:24:31 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (301.5, 260.8) = 15 48 16.27 -45 33 0.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 82.8 +/- 13.5 Background counts = 31.9 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Sat Aug 11 10:24:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.74' [Sat Aug 11 10:28:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Aug 11 10:28:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80" [Sat Aug 11 10:28:10 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.951 [Sat Aug 11 10:28:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 7.80" [Sat Aug 11 13:00:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 13:00:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 13:00:22 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27 appears to have run properly [Sat Aug 11 13:00:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 13:00:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv [Sat Aug 11 13:00:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 13:00:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv [Sat Aug 11 13:00:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Source 29 is offset by -7.136211 and 0.369525 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.952230 x 0.952230, not incorporating fit results [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Aug 11 14:25:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Aug 11 14:25:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Aug 11 14:25:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80" [Sat Aug 11 14:25:27 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.951 [Sat Aug 11 14:25:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 7.80" [Sat Aug 11 16:25:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 16:25:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv [Sat Aug 11 16:25:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 16:25:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv [Sat Aug 11 16:25:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Aug 11 16:25:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 16:25:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv [Sat Aug 11 16:25:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 16:25:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv [Sat Aug 11 16:25:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Source 29 is offset by -2.564831 and -2.411287 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.533890 x 1.533890, not incorporating fit results [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 386.343000, observed total counts = 321.000000 [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 29 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Aug 11 17:11:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Aug 11 17:11:30 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26180.401672, 22641.606049, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Aug 11 17:11:30 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src.reg [Sat Aug 11 17:11:30 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (264, 223) - (339, 298) [Sat Aug 11 17:11:30 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26180.401672, 22641.606049, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27368.213600, 24564.270000, 1002.232029, 1002.232029, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27494.567400, 23865.886000, 1041.280030, 1041.280030, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28882.929443, 22634.384369, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27680.995853, 23129.216299, 1250.144036, 446.215391, 75.568181, X, Y) && !ellipse(27990.543152, 21858.224500, 1325.504038, 391.276626, 74.712865, X, Y) && !ellipse(28071.341000, 21551.854000, 800.232023, 800.232023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28404.063200, 20101.290000, 904.288026, 904.288026, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28492.644200, 19797.848000, 992.200029, 992.200029, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Aug 11 17:11:30 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29.gif [Sat Aug 11 17:36:34 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1523.92, 4743.39) [Sat Aug 11 17:36:36 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat Aug 11 17:37:04 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat Aug 11 17:37:04 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Aug 11 17:37:04 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Aug 11 19:06:36 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 82 counts [Sat Aug 11 19:06:36 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Aug 11 20:03:07 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Aug 11 20:03:07 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Aug 11 20:03:09 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Aug 11 20:03:09 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00744, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0105460501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29.arf [Sat Aug 11 20:03:09 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Aug 11 20:03:09 2012] Updating source flux to 2.4e-14 [Sat Aug 11 20:04:23 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting