[Sun Aug 12 10:23:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (309.3, 335.9) = 13 33 57.62 -31 29 24.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 46.3 +/- 10.7 Background counts = 17.2 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005 [Sun Aug 12 10:23:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.82' [Sun Aug 12 14:50:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Aug 12 14:50:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.84" [Sun Aug 12 14:50:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.943 [Sun Aug 12 14:50:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 7.84" [Sun Aug 12 16:44:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 16:44:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv [Sun Aug 12 16:44:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 16:44:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv [Sun Aug 12 16:44:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 12 16:44:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 16:44:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv [Sun Aug 12 16:44:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 16:44:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv [Sun Aug 12 16:44:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 12 16:45:19 2012] Warning: source 34 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 13.206992 pixels away [Sun Aug 12 16:45:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 12 16:45:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 12 16:45:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 12 16:45:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 12 16:45:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.84" [Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.943 [Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 7.84" [Sun Aug 12 21:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 21:23:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv [Sun Aug 12 21:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 21:23:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv [Sun Aug 12 21:23:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 12 21:23:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 21:23:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv [Sun Aug 12 21:23:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists [Sun Aug 12 21:23:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv [Sun Aug 12 21:23:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 256.921000, observed total counts = 219.000000 [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Aug 12 21:23:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0