[Sun Aug 12 10:23:18 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (227.0, 354.6) = 13 34 25.57 -31 27 58.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 35.6 +/- 8.8
  Background counts = 11.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Sun Aug 12 10:23:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.59'
[Sun Aug 12 13:22:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 12 13:22:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.72"
[Sun Aug 12 13:22:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.003
[Sun Aug 12 13:22:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 9.72"
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 14:50:22 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 12.916216 pixels away
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 12 16:45:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 12 18:28:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 12 18:28:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.72"
[Sun Aug 12 18:28:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.003
[Sun Aug 12 18:28:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 9.72"
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 12 19:45:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0105261501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:15 2012] Source 15 is offset by 5.744255 and -7.688095 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.162404 x 1.162404, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:15 2012] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 12.916216 pixels away
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 12 21:23:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9