[Sun Jun  2 08:34:29 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (176.5, 217.8) = 20 13 9.19 -57 1 23.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 85.1 +/- 14.6
  Background counts = 41.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Jun  2 08:34:30 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.60'
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 41, frac = 1.004
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:35:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Warning: source 67 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 68 at 15.787741 pixels away
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:07 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:58 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 41, frac = 1.004
[Sun Jun  2 08:36:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 68 at 15.787741 pixels away
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 08:37:31 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0