[Sun Jun 2 08:34:27 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (275.5, 356.0) = 20 12 16.42 -56 51 23.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 208.4 +/- 29.6 Background counts = 307.0 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Sun Jun 2 08:34:30 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.49' [Sun Jun 2 08:35:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 2 08:35:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.67" [Sun Jun 2 08:35:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.005 [Sun Jun 2 08:35:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 0, mean size = 8.67" [Sun Jun 2 08:35:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg exists [Sun Jun 2 08:35:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv [Sun Jun 2 08:35:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 2 08:35:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv [Sun Jun 2 08:35:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 2 08:35:36 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists [Sun Jun 2 08:35:36 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 2 08:35:36 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0105260601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 2 08:36:07 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4601.250000, observed total counts = 3419.000000 [Sun Jun 2 08:36:07 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 40 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 2 08:36:07 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4151.000000, observed total counts = 3845.000000 [Sun Jun 2 08:36:07 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 40 = 0.158568 pixels [Sun Jun 2 08:36:07 2013] 4059.255100 total counts/ 4000.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.927030 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 40 = 0.158568 pixels Position = (275.3, 355.9) = 20 12 16.50 -56 51 24.3 Extent = 4.4 (2.2-9.3)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 58.6 +/- 63.7 Background counts = 4000.6 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability