[Sat May  4 00:54:15 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (309.1, 193.9) = 20 13 12.48 -56 51 33.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.8 +/- 15.8
  Background counts = 80.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat May  4 00:54:15 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.62'
[Sat May  4 00:57:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 00:57:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.24"
[Sat May  4 00:57:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.075
[Sat May  4 00:57:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 0, mean size = 10.24"
[Sat May  4 04:51:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 04:51:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Sat May  4 04:51:06 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 04:51:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Sat May  4 04:51:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 04:51:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 04:51:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Sat May  4 04:51:08 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 04:51:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Sat May  4 04:51:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 11:23:34 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1251.300000, observed total counts = 934.000000
[Sat May  4 11:23:34 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 49
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Warning, spatial fit 48 centroid is now closest to src. 39
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Source 49 is offset by 1.298462 and 2.343748 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.207274 x 1.207274, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 11:23:35 2013] Source is confused with source 41
[Sat May  4 11:24:10 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 11:24:10 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.24"
[Sat May  4 11:24:10 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.075
[Sat May  4 11:24:10 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 38 for pass 1, mean size = 10.24"
[Sat May  4 13:50:30 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 13:50:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Sat May  4 13:50:30 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 13:50:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Sat May  4 13:50:30 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 13:50:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 13:50:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat May  4 13:50:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 13:50:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat May  4 13:50:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0105260301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1240.080000, observed total counts = 934.000000
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 49
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 38 centroid is now closest to src. 41
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Source 49 is offset by -2.991055 and 2.983426 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.242221 x 1.242221, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 18:04:03 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0