[Sat Sep  1 03:19:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (184.0, 468.7) = 11 1 36.29 11 13 31.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 32.3 +/- 7.7
  Background counts = 5.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Sat Sep  1 03:19:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.88'
[Sat Sep  1 03:20:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep  1 03:20:27 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Sep  1 03:20:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87"
[Sat Sep  1 03:20:27 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.030
[Sat Sep  1 03:20:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 13.87"
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:12:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 118.174000, observed total counts = 100.000000
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:32 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87"
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:32 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.030
[Sat Sep  1 04:22:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 13.87"
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Sep  1 04:55:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0103861801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 18.266274 pixels away
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep  1 05:00:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0