[Fri May 25 02:36:50 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (260.4, 168.1) = 18 1 8.41 -24 59 29.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 187.1 +/- 26.6 Background counts = 202.9 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006 [Fri May 25 02:36:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.84' [Fri May 25 07:00:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 25 07:00:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.35" [Fri May 25 07:00:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.931 [Fri May 25 07:00:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 11.35" [Fri May 25 20:33:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists [Fri May 25 20:33:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Fri May 25 20:33:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 20:33:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Fri May 25 20:33:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 25 20:33:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Fri May 25 20:33:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 20:33:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 36 at 11.600613 pixels away [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 34 [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Source 36 is offset by 9.562859 and -0.569689 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.277513 x 1.277513, not incorporating fit results [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 26 08:11:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 26 12:18:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 26 12:18:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.35" [Sat May 26 12:18:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.931 [Sat May 26 12:18:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 11.35" [Sat May 26 23:42:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists [Sat May 26 23:42:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv [Sat May 26 23:42:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists [Sat May 26 23:42:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv [Sat May 26 23:42:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 26 23:42:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Sat May 26 23:42:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Sat May 26 23:42:28 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 36 at 11.600613 pixels away [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 34 [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Source 36 is offset by 9.562859 and -0.569666 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.277499 x 1.277499, not incorporating fit results [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 27 03:12:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 27 04:50:26 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22604.942749, 14576.377090, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun May 27 04:50:26 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36_src.reg [Sun May 27 04:50:26 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (223, 131) - (298, 206) [Sun May 27 04:50:26 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22604.942749, 14576.377090, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21959.256000, 8220.130800, 8114.784234, 6507.432187, 203.247000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23266.312200, 8166.190600, 6716.112193, 6716.112193, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22805.420000, 8479.826000, 7972.056229, 7972.056229, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22645.826200, 12320.540000, 1110.896032, 1110.896032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22769.928925, 13173.540588, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22720.170000, 17331.912000, 1370.152039, 1370.152039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22694.982758, 16829.750900, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22722.032196, 15704.193710, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22688.939911, 13861.890121, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22676.036469, 16400.197693, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22643.119415, 15267.264832, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24652.692000, 11372.960000, 1951.456056, 1951.456056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21543.362473, 11941.036163, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun May 27 04:50:26 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36.gif [Sun May 27 05:17:37 2012] Mean detx,y = (9967.44, 1885.49) [Sun May 27 05:17:38 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun May 27 05:17:51 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun May 27 05:17:51 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun May 27 05:17:51 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36_bgd.pi.gz [Sun May 27 05:56:21 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun May 27 05:56:21 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon May 28 22:37:21 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon May 28 22:37:21 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon May 28 22:37:22 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon May 28 22:37:22 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.044, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0103261901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src36.arf [Mon May 28 22:37:22 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon May 28 22:37:22 2012] Updating source flux to 7.2e-13 [Mon May 28 22:37:24 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting