[Tue Jan 31 10:27:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (460.4, 340.3) = 1 32 6.57 30 49 10.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 35.1 +/- 8.5
  Background counts = 8.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Jan 31 10:27:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.13'
[Tue Jan 31 10:42:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan 31 10:42:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.49"
[Tue Jan 31 10:42:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.077
[Tue Jan 31 10:42:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 12.49"
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:01:45 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 17.084669 pixels away
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jan 31 11:15:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jan 31 11:28:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan 31 11:28:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.49"
[Tue Jan 31 11:28:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.077
[Tue Jan 31 11:28:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 12.49"
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan 31 11:41:36 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0102641001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan 31 11:54:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 70.694600, observed total counts = 71.000000
[Tue Jan 31 11:54:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.224844 pixels
[Tue Jan 31 11:54:26 2012] 73.469500 total counts/ 61.556800 bgd. counts: snr = 1.518351
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.224844 pixels
  Position = (460.2, 340.2) = 1 32 6.65 30 49 9.2
  Extent = 4.6 (3.1-9.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.9 +/- 8.6
  Background counts = 61.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability