[Tue Sep  4 06:35:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (329.9, 407.9) = 2 5 29.53 64 57 19.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 58.5 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 26.4
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Sep  4 06:35:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.26'
[Tue Sep  4 07:51:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 07:51:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Tue Sep  4 07:51:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.022
[Tue Sep  4 07:51:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 10.56"
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:02:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 37
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 10:13:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 11:38:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 11:38:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Tue Sep  4 11:38:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.022
[Tue Sep  4 11:38:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 10.56"
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Sep  4 13:11:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0102580601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 209.934000, observed total counts = 174.000000
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 14:19:13 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9