[Mon Aug 20 10:33:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (175.2, 228.1) = 4 24 44.90 14 41 36.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.2 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 9.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Aug 20 10:33:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.29'
[Mon Aug 20 12:43:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 12:43:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.57"
[Mon Aug 20 12:43:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.901
[Mon Aug 20 12:43:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 11.57"
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:35:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 24 at 11.437387 pixels away
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 20 14:48:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 16:40:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 16:40:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.57"
[Mon Aug 20 16:40:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.901
[Mon Aug 20 16:40:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 11.57"
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 17:12:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101440601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Source 24 is offset by -2.677391 and -7.891044 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.183467 x 2.183467, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 17:55:50 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0