[Sat Dec 24 02:41:16 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (319.6, 334.2) = 19 21 12.65 -58 38 43.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 121.7 +/- 23.7
  Background counts = 113.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Sat Dec 24 02:41:17 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.01'
[Sat Dec 24 02:45:43 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 24 02:45:43 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.94"
[Sat Dec 24 02:45:43 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.972
[Sat Dec 24 02:45:43 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 7.94"
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 04:00:14 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Source 8 is offset by 0.556894 and 6.463873 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.668097 x 1.668097, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:20 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:37 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:37 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.94"
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:37 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.972
[Sat Dec 24 09:07:37 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 7.94"
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:29 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:29 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:30 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:30 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 09:33:30 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Source 8 is offset by 6.871367 and 6.527068 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.618175 x 1.618175, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 24 13:23:49 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9