[Mon Sep 26 10:13:03 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (312.6, 290.9) = 13 49 12.50 -30 17 26.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 118.3 +/- 18.9
  Background counts = 25.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon Sep 26 10:13:03 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.17'
[Mon Sep 26 13:31:20 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 13:31:20 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.01"
[Mon Sep 26 13:31:20 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.897
[Mon Sep 26 13:31:20 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 7.01"
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 14:16:50 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Source 11 is offset by 7.081755 and 4.642028 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.878294 x 2.878294, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 14:17:00 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep 26 16:39:03 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 16:39:03 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.01"
[Mon Sep 26 16:39:03 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.897
[Mon Sep 26 16:39:03 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 7.01"
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 17:43:58 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Source 11 is offset by 7.081755 and 4.664005 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.469582 x 2.469582, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep 26 17:44:05 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9