[Sat Sep 24 02:18:18 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (259.0, 396.5) = 10 23 41.12 20 0 36.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 41.9 +/- 9.2
  Background counts = 13.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sat Sep 24 02:18:18 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.66'
[Sat Sep 24 04:15:31 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep 24 04:15:31 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Sat Sep 24 04:15:31 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.918
[Sat Sep 24 04:15:31 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 10.26"
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 05:08:57 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0101040301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Source 12 is offset by -0.152731 and 2.348887 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.147880 x 1.147880, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 169.109000, observed total counts = 169.000000
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.102186 pixels
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] 169.403700 total counts/ 147.467000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.806441
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.102186 pixels
  Position = (258.9, 396.6) = 10 23 41.15 20 0 36.0
  Extent = 3.2 (2.6-5.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 21.9 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 147.5
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep 24 05:55:49 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9